2010 SS vs. 2011 5.0 (a true test)

[flyinglow57]

i like how they say the tq is way lower on the camaro and the peak tq is 350 rpm higher on the camaro.. i know it comes on lower but still kinda funny.

im not 75% happy with my camaro but rumore has it gears help alot.. AALOTT

[danhr]

i like how they say the tq is way lower on the camaro and the peak tq is 350 rpm higher on the camaro.. i know it comes on lower but still kinda funny.

im not 75% happy with my camaro but rumore has it gears help alot.. AALOTT

yes.... they do.. A LOT

[77rednecktruck]

as it has always been, the camaro is a nice motor wrapped in a shitbox. The mustang was never as fast but had everything else going for it. Give it a few more years until the camaro is discontinued again.

[Quik]

you claim you love ford but said the stang was never as fast. You sir dont follow up on cars so much do ya? the fox body owned the GMs till the late LT1 came out and then finally when the LS1 did GM start destroying mustangs

as it has always been, the camaro is a nice motor wrapped in a shitbox. The mustang was never as fast but had everything else going for it. Give it a few more years until the camaro is discontinued again.

[Orr89rocz]

stock for stock the L98 80's cars could beat the stangs. Mild mods it was pretty close but the lighter stang out ran them once you got into full bolt ons and tunes/etc.

Not much could handle the 92 firehawk or the 89 turbo trans am Pontiac had some quick cars back then

Oh and on the road course, the IROCZ kicked major ass

[Quik]

about 10 yrs ago in GM high tech they broke it down over the years how the camaro vs stang rivalry was and who was victor. in the 80s GM only had one car worth a dam and it sure as hell didnt have a v8 under the hood. thats why after awhile there was an event buick vs mustang. The GMs were a joke, heavier and slower for the time

stock for stock the L98 80's cars could beat the stangs. Mild mods it was pretty close but the lighter stang out ran them once you got into full bolt ons and tunes/etc.

Not much could handle the 92 firehawk or the 89 turbo trans am Pontiac had some quick cars back then

Oh and on the road course, the IROCZ kicked major ass

[Swarzkopf]

I'm still in disbelief that Dodge keeps selling the Challenger R/T for $33,000 when it get's whooped on by V6 Mustangs and Camaros, and the Challenger SRT-8 for $43,000 when it get's beat up by $30,000 Mustang GTs and Camaro SS'.

It's really a matter of preference between the Mustang and Camaro. The Challenger is so far behind it's pathetic- Dodge needs to really up the performance or cut the price. It's telling that the Challenger isn't even included in these magazine comparos.

[Darkstar]

I'm not reading this, but I bet $20 the Ford is slower.

[BigMack_Srt8]

dodge still keeps selling the challenger r/t because of old people going through midlife crisis's who cant afford a vette. They take there stock r/t's to car shows and think there in because they have a new version of what once was a sick car.